manager: be important to organizations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to organizations 1.00
be necessary in organizations 0.94
plan in organizations 0.88
be important to organization 0.86
be important to organization 's success 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employee, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organizations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employee, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(manager, be important to organizations)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organization)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manager, be important to organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(manager, be important to organization)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organizations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(manager, be important to organizations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)