manager: be paid more than workers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid more than workers 1.00
be different from employees 0.83
keep employees 0.80
treat employees like children 0.79
keep bad employees 0.79
hang out with employees 0.78
lie to employees 0.78
ignore employees 0.77
understand needs of employees 0.77
motivate employees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boss, keep bad employees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manager, be paid more than workers)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(boss, keep employees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manager, be paid more than workers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(boss, keep employees)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(boss, keep bad employees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(boss, keep employees)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(boss, keep bad employees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boss, keep bad employees)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(manager, be paid more than workers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(boss, keep employees)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(manager, be paid more than workers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(manager, be paid more than workers)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(manager, hang out with employees)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(manager, hang out with employees)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(manager, hang out with employees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manager, hang out with employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manager, be paid more than workers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boss, keep employees)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(boss, keep bad employees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boss, keep employees)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manager, be paid more than workers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(boss, keep bad employees)