manager: fail in planning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail in planning 1.00
fail 0.84
need plan 0.79
be interested in manpower planning 0.77
have plan 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(executive, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(manager, fail in planning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(executive, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(executive, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(executive, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manager, fail in planning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(administrator, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(administrator, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(manager, fail in planning)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(manager, fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manager, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(manager, fail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(manager, need plan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(manager, have plan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(manager, need plan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in manpower planning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(manager, have plan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(manager, need plan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(manager, have plan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(manager, be interested in manpower planning)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(manager, be interested in manpower planning)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in manpower planning)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(manager, need plan)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(manager, have plan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail in planning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(manager, fail in planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(executive, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(administrator, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(manager, fail in planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(executive, fail)