manager: need study management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need study management 1.00
use management 0.86
study study about computer 0.83
use management information system 0.81
use strategic management 0.80
apply four functions of management 0.77
apply modern management techniques 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(manager, need study management)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(manager, use management)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(manager, use management)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(manager, use management)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(manager, study study about computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(manager, use management information system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(manager, use strategic management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(manager, use strategic management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(manager, use management information system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manager, study study about computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(manager, use strategic management)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(manager, use management information system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manager, apply four functions of management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use strategic management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(manager, study study about computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manager, apply four functions of management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(manager, apply four functions of management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(manager, study study about computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(manager, apply four functions of management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manager, need study management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manager, need study management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(manager, need study management)