manager: use management information system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use management information system 1.00
use management 0.88
need information technology 0.87
use information help 0.87
need information 0.85
need accounting information 0.82
use strategic management 0.81
apply four functions of management 0.81
need study management 0.81
apply modern management techniques 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(manager, use management information system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(employee, need accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(manager, use management information system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, need information)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(employee, need accounting information)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, need accounting information)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(owner, need information)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(manager, use management information system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(employee, need accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(manager, use management information system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(owner, need information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(owner, need information)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(owner, need accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(owner, need accounting information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(manager, use management information system)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(manager, use management)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manager, use information help)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(manager, use information help)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(manager, need information)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(manager, need information)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(manager, need accounting information)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manager, apply four functions of management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use strategic management)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manager, need study management)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(manager, use management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(manager, use management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(manager, use information help)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(manager, use information help)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(manager, need information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(manager, need information)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(manager, use strategic management)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(manager, use strategic management)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(manager, need accounting information)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(manager, need accounting information)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(manager, use strategic management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(manager, need accounting information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(manager, need study management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manager, apply four functions of management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manager, need study management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(manager, apply four functions of management)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manager, apply modern management techniques)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(manager, need study management)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(manager, apply four functions of management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(manager, use management information system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(owner, need information)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(owner, need accounting information)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(manager, use management information system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)