manchester: be great for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be great for business 1.00
is great 0.89
be good place buy 0.76
is big 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(liverpool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(manchester, be great for business)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manchester, is great)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is great)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(manchester, is great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(manchester, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be great for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(manchester, be great for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(liverpool, is great)