manchester: have down in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have down in 10th city 1.00
have down in city 1.00
is city 0.86
is best city 0.80
is major city 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is major city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(liverpool, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(portsmouth, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, is city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(leeds, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leeds, is city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(melbourne, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(liverpool, is major city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is major city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(manchester, have down in city)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(manchester, is city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is best city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is major city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(manchester, is city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(manchester, is city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(manchester, is best city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(manchester, is major city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manchester, is major city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manchester, is best city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manchester, is major city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(manchester, is best city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(manchester, have down in city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(liverpool, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(portsmouth, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(liverpool, is major city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leeds, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(melbourne, is city)