manchester: was united

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was united 1.00
is united 0.98
be called united 0.97
be united good 0.95
be united bad 0.93
be united popular 0.92
be united best 0.92
be united successful 0.90
be united hated 0.90
be united playing 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(leeds, be united hated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is united)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is united)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(liverpool, is united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is united)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(leeds, is united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leeds, is united)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(leeds, be united hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(leeds, be united hated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(manchester, was united)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united hated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(manchester, be united hated)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(manchester, is united)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(manchester, be united hated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be called united)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(manchester, is united)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is united)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(manchester, is united)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(manchester, be called united)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(manchester, be united popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(manchester, be called united)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(manchester, be united hated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manchester, be called united)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(manchester, be united popular)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(manchester, be united popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(manchester, was united)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liverpool, is united)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(leeds, is united)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leeds, be united hated)