mandala: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graphic
Weight: 0.39
, form
Weight: 0.37
, artwork
Weight: 0.37
, place
Weight: 0.24
Siblings sculpture
Weight: 0.29
, collage
Weight: 0.28
, tapestry
Weight: 0.28
, mosaic
Weight: 0.28
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.81
was made 0.78
is kizoa 0.76
is xtc 0.76
is ks2 0.76
is glenview 0.76
is ks1 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(collage, is kizoa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was made)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tapestry, is glenview)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(collage, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mosaic, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(collage, is ks1)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(collage, is ks2)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mosaic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mosaic, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(collage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(collage, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(collage, is kizoa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(collage, is kizoa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(collage, is ks2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(collage, is ks2)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(collage, is ks1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(collage, is ks1)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(calligraphy, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(tapestry, is glenview) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tapestry, is glenview)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(mandala, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mandala, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mandala, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mandala, is xtc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mandala, is xtc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mandala, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mandala, is xtc)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mandala, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mandala, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandala, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mandala, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mandala, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mandala, is xtc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mandala, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(collage, is ks1)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(collage, is ks2)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(collage, is kizoa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tapestry, is glenview)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was made)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mosaic, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mandala, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(collage, has quality good)