mandate: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rule
Weight: 0.68
, regulation
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.58
, authority
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law
Weight: 0.68
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, prohibition
Weight: 0.34
, recommendation
Weight: 0.33
, amendment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
has quality good 0.84
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(regulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(authority, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(authority, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(regulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mandate, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mandate, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mandate, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recommendation, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)