mandrill: have big teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monkey
Weight: 0.54
, artist
Weight: 0.52
, service
Weight: 0.42
, baboon
Weight: 0.41
, primate
Weight: 0.40
Siblings spider monkey
Weight: 0.34
, ape
Weight: 0.33
, red panda
Weight: 0.33
, panda bear
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(baboon, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mandrill, have big teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(baboon, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mandrill, have big teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mandrill, have big teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mandrill, has physical part teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mandrill, has physical part teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mandrill, has physical part teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mandrill, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mandrill, have big teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mandrill, have big teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mandrill, have big teeth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part teeth)