mannequin: has physical part nipples

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.62
, movie
Weight: 0.57
, film
Weight: 0.53
, object
Weight: 0.49
Siblings toy car
Weight: 0.33
, doll
Weight: 0.33
, lingerie
Weight: 0.33
, underwear
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part nipples 1.00
have hard nipples 0.93
have erect nipples 0.85
has physical part mouths 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mannequin, has physical part nipples)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have hard nipples)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mannequin, have hard nipples)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have erect nipples)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mannequin, have hard nipples)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mannequin, have erect nipples)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mannequin, have erect nipples)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mannequin, have hard nipples)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(mannequin, have erect nipples)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, has physical part nipples)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mannequin, has physical part nipples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mannequin, has physical part nipples)