manor: were important in middle ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.52
, estate
Weight: 0.49
, place
Weight: 0.49
, property
Weight: 0.49
Siblings real estate
Weight: 0.33
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.32
, gentleman
Weight: 0.31
, villa
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in middle ages 1.00
be important in middle ages 0.98
were important in ages 0.96
were alike during middle ages 0.95
be important in ages 0.94
were alike during ages 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(manor, were important in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(manor, be important in middle ages)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(manor, were alike during middle ages)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(manor, were important in ages)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(manor, be important in middle ages)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(manor, be important in ages)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manor, be important in middle ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(manor, were alike during middle ages)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(manor, were alike during middle ages)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(manor, were important in ages)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(manor, were alike during ages)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(manor, be important in ages)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(manor, were important in ages)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(manor, be important in ages)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(manor, were alike during ages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manor, were alike during middle ages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(manor, were alike during ages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manor, be important in middle ages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(manor, were important in ages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(manor, be important in ages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manor, were alike during ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manor, were important in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manor, were important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manor, were important in middle ages)