manta ray: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ray
Weight: 0.77
, species
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.66
, fish
Weight: 0.62
, shark
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.40
, dolphin
Weight: 0.36
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part horns 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(manta ray, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(manta ray, has physical part horns)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(manta ray, has physical part horns)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, has physical part horns)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(manta ray, has physical part horns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(manta ray, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)