:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(star, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mantle, be hot)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(star, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mantle, be hot)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(star, be hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(star, is hot)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(star, be hot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(star, is hot)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(star, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mantle, be hot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(star, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mantle, be hot)
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mantle, be hot)
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mantle, is hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mantle, is hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mantle, is hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mantle, is hot)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mantle, be hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(star, be hot)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(star, is hot)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(star, be hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mantle, be hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(star, is hot)