mantle: have convection currents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.55
, star
Weight: 0.54
, legend
Weight: 0.50
, layer
Weight: 0.49
Siblings lithosphere
Weight: 0.46
, trophy
Weight: 0.31
, halo
Weight: 0.31
, aura
Weight: 0.31
, robe
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have convection currents 1.00
is convection 0.93
undergo convection 0.87
melt at subduction zones 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mantle, have convection currents)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mantle, is convection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mantle, is convection)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mantle, undergo convection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mantle, is convection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mantle, undergo convection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mantle, undergo convection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mantle, undergo convection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mantle, is convection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mantle, have convection currents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(mantle, have convection currents)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mantle, have convection currents)