manual: be cheaper than automatics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents publication
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, document
Weight: 0.59
, accessory
Weight: 0.57
Siblings automatic transmission
Weight: 0.60
, dsm
Weight: 0.40
, fax machine
Weight: 0.34
, ventilation system
Weight: 0.33
, sewing machine
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than automatics 1.00
be better than automatics 0.97
be faster than automatics 0.96
be cheaper than automatic 0.85
be faster than automatic 0.79
be better than manual 0.78
be better than automatic 0.78
be worse than manual 0.78
be efficient less fuel 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be better than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be better than manual)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be worse than manual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manual, be better than automatics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(manual, be better than automatics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(manual, be better than automatics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be faster than automatics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manual, be better than automatic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(manual, be better than automatic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(manual, be better than automatic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manual, be faster than automatic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(manual, be better than automatic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(manual, be cheaper than automatics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be better than manual)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(manual, be cheaper than automatics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be worse than manual)