manual: be efficient more fuel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents publication
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, document
Weight: 0.59
, accessory
Weight: 0.57
Siblings automatic transmission
Weight: 0.60
, dsm
Weight: 0.40
, fax machine
Weight: 0.34
, ventilation system
Weight: 0.33
, sewing machine
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be efficient more fuel 1.00
be more efficient fuel 1.00
be efficient less fuel 0.99
be efficient fuel 0.99
consume more fuel 0.86
consume fuel 0.83
is more expensive 0.77
more efficient than handwritten 0.76
get better mileage 0.76
become more expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(equipment, become more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(document, more efficient than handwritten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(document, more efficient than handwritten)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(equipment, become more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(equipment, become more expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(document, more efficient than handwritten)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, consume more fuel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(automatic transmission, consume fuel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(document, more efficient than handwritten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(equipment, become more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(automatic transmission, consume fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, consume fuel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(automatic transmission, consume more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, consume more fuel)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(automatic transmission, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(manual, be efficient more fuel)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(manual, be efficient fuel)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient fuel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be more efficient fuel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(manual, be efficient fuel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient fuel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(manual, get better mileage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(manual, get better mileage)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(manual, get better mileage)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(manual, get better mileage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(document, more efficient than handwritten)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(equipment, become more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, consume fuel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient less fuel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, be efficient fuel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, consume more fuel)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(automatic transmission, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(document, more efficient than handwritten)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(manual, be efficient more fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(equipment, become more expensive)