manufacturing: was established in england

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.67
, sector
Weight: 0.67
, market
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.61
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.71
, factory
Weight: 0.66
, refining
Weight: 0.53
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, banking industry
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was established in england 1.00
was established in new england 0.98
is england 0.91
is new england 0.90
be successful in italy 0.77
become in india 0.77
be successful in northern italy 0.76
be developed in zealand 0.76
be developed in new zealand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sector, is new england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(industry, be developed in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(industry, be successful in northern italy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(industry, be successful in italy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sector, is england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sector, is england)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sector, is new england)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(industry, be successful in italy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(industry, be developed in new zealand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sector, is england)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sector, is new england)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(industry, be developed in new zealand)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, be successful in italy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sector, is new england)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sector, is england)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(industry, be successful in northern italy)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(industry, be developed in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(industry, be successful in italy)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manufacturing, was established in england)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(manufacturing, was established in new england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in new england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was established in new england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in new england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sector, is england)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in italy)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sector, is new england)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(industry, be developed in new zealand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sector, is england)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sector, is new england)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in italy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(manufacturing, was established in england)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(industry, be developed in new zealand)