manure: be different from chemical fertizer

Related concepts

Parents	fertilizer Weight: 0.62 , raw material Weight: 0.60 , material Weight: 0.60 , product Weight: 0.56 , option Weight: 0.55
Siblings	compost Weight: 0.35 , ammonia Weight: 0.35 , ammonium nitrate Weight: 0.35 , dairy product Weight: 0.34 , fecal matter Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be different from chemical fertizer	1.00
be better than chemical fertilizers	0.84
be different from fertilizer	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)

Similarity expansion

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(manure, be different from fertilizer)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(manure, be different from fertilizer)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from fertilizer)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(manure, be different from fertilizer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)