map: be better than globes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than globes 1.00
be used more than globes 0.97
be more useful than globes 0.96
be more limited than globes 0.94
be less accurate than globes 0.93
be accurate as globes 0.91
be as accurate as globes 0.91
be more useful than globes studying 0.90
handle compared to globes 0.90
have advantage over globes 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(map, be better than globes)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(map, be more useful than globes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(map, be less accurate than globes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(map, be less accurate than globes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(map, be as accurate as globes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(map, be more useful than globes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(map, be more limited than globes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(map, be more limited than globes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(map, be more limited than globes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(map, be less accurate than globes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(map, be more limited than globes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(map, be more useful than globes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(map, be as accurate as globes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(map, be as accurate as globes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(map, be as accurate as globes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(map, be more useful than globes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(map, be less accurate than globes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(map, be better than globes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(map, be better than globes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(map, be better than globes)