map: be better than photos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than photos 1.00
be better than maps 0.82
differ from photographs 0.82
be far more accurate than maps 0.79
be far more accurate than early maps 0.79
be better than ancient maps 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(map, be better than photos)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(map, be better than ancient maps)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(map, be better than ancient maps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(map, be better than photos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(map, be better than photos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be better than photos)