map: be important to historians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to historians 1.00
be useful to historians 0.97
was useful to historians 0.96
be important to archaeologists 0.80
help archaeologists 0.77
be important to scientists 0.77
be important to geographers 0.76
be important to history 0.75
be useful to scientists 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(artifact, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(artifact, help archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(artifact, be important to history)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to historians)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to history)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(artifact, help archaeologists)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to historians)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(artifact, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(map, be important to historians)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(map, be important to historians)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(map, be important to historians)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(artifact, help archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(map, be important to historians)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(artifact, be important to history)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(map, be important to historians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(map, be important to historians)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to historians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(map, be useful to historians)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(map, be useful to scientists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(map, be important to scientists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(map, be important to geographers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to scientists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(map, be important to geographers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(map, be important to scientists)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(map, be important to geographers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(map, be useful to scientists)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(map, be important to scientists)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to geographers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to scientists)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to scientists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to historians)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to history)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(artifact, help archaeologists)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to historians)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(map, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to history)