map: name street

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings atlas
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34
, document
Weight: 0.33
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
name street 1.00
be at street 0.87
be used to represent street 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tool, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(map, name street)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tool, be at street)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at street)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tool, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(map, name street)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(map, name street)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent street)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent street)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent street)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent street)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(map, name street)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(map, name street)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, be at street)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(map, name street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, be at street)