maple syrup: be good with pancake

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents syrup
Weight: 0.79
, herb
Weight: 0.73
, chocolate
Weight: 0.71
, fruit
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.66
Siblings licorice
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.37
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good with pancake 1.00
be at waffle 0.78
be tasty and good for you too 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(fruit, be tasty and good for you too)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(syrup, be at waffle)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be good with pancake)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(syrup, be at waffle)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fruit, be tasty and good for you too)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(syrup, be at waffle)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be tasty and good for you too)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(syrup, be at waffle)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(fruit, be tasty and good for you too)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, be good with pancake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(maple syrup, be good with pancake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be good with pancake)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be good with pancake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fruit, be tasty and good for you too)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(syrup, be at waffle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fruit, be tasty and good for you too)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(maple syrup, be good with pancake)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(syrup, be at waffle)