maple tree: lose bark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.78
, tree
Weight: 0.77
, hardwood
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.42
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.42
, oak tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose bark 1.00
shed bark 0.88
lose leaves 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tree, lose leaves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(maple tree, lose bark)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deciduous tree, lose leaves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(maple tree, lose bark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, lose leaves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tree, lose leaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, lose leaves)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tree, lose leaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, lose bark)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, lose leaves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cherry tree, lose leaves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, shed bark)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tree, lose leaves)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(deciduous tree, lose leaves)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(oak tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(oak tree, lose bark)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(oak tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(oak tree, shed bark)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(oak tree, lose leaves)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(oak tree, lose leaves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cherry tree, lose leaves)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cherry tree, lose leaves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(maple tree, lose bark)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(maple tree, shed bark)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(maple tree, shed bark)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(maple tree, shed bark)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(maple tree, lose leaves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(maple tree, lose leaves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose leaves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(maple tree, lose leaves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, shed bark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(maple tree, lose bark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, lose leaves)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tree, lose leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(oak tree, lose leaves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cherry tree, lose leaves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(oak tree, lose bark)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oak tree, shed bark)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, lose leaves)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(maple tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tree, lose leaves)