maple: is better chinese maple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.74
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.70
, tree
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings maple tree
Weight: 0.41
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better chinese maple 1.00
is better then chinese maple 0.99
is chinese maple 0.99
is then chinese maple 0.98
is maple 0.90
is good wood 0.77
be canadian leaf 0.76
is wood 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(oak, is good wood)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(oak, is wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(oak, is good wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(oak, is good wood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(oak, is wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(oak, is wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(maple, is better chinese maple)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(maple, is chinese maple)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(maple, is chinese maple)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(maple, is chinese maple)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(maple, is maple)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(maple, is maple)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(maple, is maple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(maple, is wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(maple, is good wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(maple, is good wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(maple, is wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(maple, is wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(maple, is good wood)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maple, is chinese maple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(maple, is good wood)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(maple, is maple)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maple, is wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(maple, is better chinese maple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(oak, is wood)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(oak, is good wood)