marathon: is damn expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents race
Weight: 0.69
, day
Weight: 0.63
, distance
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mile
Weight: 0.34
, relay
Weight: 0.33
, rainy day
Weight: 0.33
, hour
Weight: 0.33
, run
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is damn expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.84
is crap 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(relay, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(run, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(run, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(run, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(relay, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(relay, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(marathon, is damn expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(marathon, is crap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(marathon, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(marathon, is crap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(marathon, is crap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(marathon, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(marathon, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(marathon, is crap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marathon, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(marathon, is damn expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marathon, is damn expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(relay, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(marathon, is damn expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(run, is expensive)