mardi gras: is purple green

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new orleans
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, holiday
Weight: 0.61
, carnival
Weight: 0.57
, day
Weight: 0.57
Siblings louis armstrong
Weight: 0.36
, tour de france
Weight: 0.34
, yom kippur
Weight: 0.34
, santa claus
Weight: 0.33
, wimbledon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is purple green 1.00
has color green 0.91
is colors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wimbledon, has color green)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(wimbledon, has color green)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(wimbledon, has color green)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mardi gras, is purple green)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mardi gras, has color green)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mardi gras, has color green)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(mardi gras, has color green)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mardi gras, has color green)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mardi gras, is colors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mardi gras, is colors)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(mardi gras, is colors)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mardi gras, is colors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mardi gras, is purple green)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mardi gras, is purple green)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mardi gras, is purple green)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wimbledon, has color green)