margarine: is inferior good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.66
, product
Weight: 0.61
, peanut butter
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, dairy product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.35
, mayonnaise
Weight: 0.35
, flour
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is inferior good 1.00
is inferior 0.98
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(margarine, is inferior good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(flour, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mayonnaise, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(wheat flour, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(flour, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(flour, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mayonnaise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mayonnaise, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(margarine, is inferior good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(margarine, is inferior)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(margarine, is inferior)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(margarine, is inferior)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(margarine, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(margarine, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(margarine, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(margarine, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(margarine, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(margarine, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(margarine, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(margarine, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(margarine, is inferior good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wheat flour, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(flour, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mayonnaise, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(margarine, is inferior good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)