marina: has dock and boat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.64
, city
Weight: 0.64
, property
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.57
Siblings salt lake city
Weight: 0.36
, park
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.34
, campground
Weight: 0.34
, pier
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has dock and boat 1.00
be used to dock boat 0.99
has boat 0.92
be used to tie up boat 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pier, be used to tie up boat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pier, be used to tie up boat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pier, be used to tie up boat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(marina, has dock and boat)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(marina, be used to dock boat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(marina, be used to dock boat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marina, be used to dock boat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(marina, has boat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(marina, has boat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(marina, has boat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(marina, has boat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(marina, be used to dock boat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(marina, has dock and boat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(marina, has dock and boat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(marina, has dock and boat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pier, be used to tie up boat)