marker: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings blood
Weight: 0.60
, pen
Weight: 0.57
, tattoo
Weight: 0.55
, sharpie
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
were invented 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pen, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pen, were invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pen, was invented)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pen, was invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pen, were invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pen, were invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(marker, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(marker, were invented)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(marker, were invented)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(marker, were invented)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(marker, were invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(marker, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(marker, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pen, was invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(marker, was invented)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pen, were invented)