marker: were invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings blood
Weight: 0.60
, pen
Weight: 0.57
, tattoo
Weight: 0.55
, sharpie
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
were invented 1.00
was invented 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pen, were invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pen, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pen, were invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pen, were invented)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pen, was invented)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pen, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(marker, were invented)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(marker, was invented)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(marker, was invented)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(marker, was invented)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(marker, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(marker, were invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(marker, were invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pen, was invented)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(marker, were invented)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pen, were invented)