market: be at rural area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock market
Weight: 0.68
, country
Weight: 0.60
, business activity
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dealer
Weight: 0.66
, company
Weight: 0.64
, unit
Weight: 0.61
, quebec city
Weight: 0.61
, mobile
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rural area 1.00
has large area of land 0.80
be at countryside 0.79
be at town 0.76
be at region 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(country, be at region)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(market, be at rural area)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(country, has large area of land)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(market, be at rural area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(country, has large area of land)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(country, be at region)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(country, has large area of land)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(country, be at region)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(company, be at countryside)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(company, be at town)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(country, has large area of land)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(market, be at rural area)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(country, be at region)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(market, be at rural area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(company, be at countryside)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(company, be at countryside)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(company, be at town)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(company, be at town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(market, be at rural area)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(market, be at town)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(market, be at town)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(market, be at town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(market, be at rural area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(country, has large area of land)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(country, be at region)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(company, be at town)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(company, be at countryside)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(country, has large area of land)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(market, be at rural area)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(country, be at region)