marketing: be in economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
, business
Weight: 0.60
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.66
, planning
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.33
, engineering
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in economy 1.00
be to economy 1.00
very is necessary during recession 0.82
help economic development 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(marketing, be in economy)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(marketing, be to economy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(marketing, be to economy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(marketing, be to economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(marketing, help economic development)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(marketing, very is necessary during recession)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(marketing, very is necessary during recession)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(marketing, very is necessary during recession)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(marketing, help economic development)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(marketing, help economic development)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(marketing, very is necessary during recession)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(marketing, help economic development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be in economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(marketing, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(marketing, be in economy)