marmoset: be at canadian woodland

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monkey
Weight: 0.52
, primate
Weight: 0.49
, animal
Weight: 0.43
Siblings spider monkey
Weight: 0.33
, lemur
Weight: 0.32
, ape
Weight: 0.32
, gibbon
Weight: 0.32
, orangutan
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at canadian woodland 1.00
be at woodland 0.85
be at canadian zoo 0.84
be at forest of america 0.82
be at indian forest 0.80
be at forrest 0.76
be at south american jungle tree 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be at indian forest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at indian forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at indian forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at canadian zoo)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forrest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be at indian forest)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lemur, be at canadian zoo)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at canadian zoo)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lemur, be at forrest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forrest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian zoo)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at forest of america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at canadian zoo)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at south american jungle tree)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(marmoset, be at south american jungle tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at south american jungle tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at forest of america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(marmoset, be at canadian zoo)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at south american jungle tree)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(marmoset, be at forest of america)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian zoo)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at forest of america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, be at indian forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lemur, be at canadian zoo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forrest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(marmoset, be at canadian woodland)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, be at indian forest)