marmot: be at africa

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at africa 1.00
be at america 0.82
be at europe 0.81
be at british columbia 0.78
be at south america 0.78
be at north america 0.77
be at switzerland 0.76
be at sierra nevada 0.76
be at saginaw michigan 0.75
be at michigan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(marmot, be at africa)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at north america)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(marmot, be at africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(animal, be at africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(animal, be at north america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at africa)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at north america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at british columbia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at michigan)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, be at north america)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(beaver, be at america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at america)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(beaver, be at british columbia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at british columbia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(beaver, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(marmot, be at africa)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at europe)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at switzerland)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(marmot, be at europe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at north america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at south america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(marmot, be at switzerland)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at sierra nevada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(marmot, be at south america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(marmot, be at north america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at europe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at switzerland)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(marmot, be at sierra nevada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at south america)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at north america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(marmot, be at south america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(marmot, be at north america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at sierra nevada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(marmot, be at sierra nevada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(marmot, be at europe)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(marmot, be at switzerland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(marmot, be at africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(animal, be at africa)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, be at north america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(beaver, be at america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at british columbia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(beaver, be at michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(animal, be at africa)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(marmot, be at africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, be at north america)