marmot: be at alpine environment

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at alpine environment 1.00
be at mountain 0.79
be at all ski resort 0.78
be at high mountain 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(marmot, be at alpine environment)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at mountain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at high mountain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(marmot, be at all ski resort)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at all ski resort)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at all ski resort)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(marmot, be at mountain)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(marmot, be at high mountain)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(marmot, be at mountain)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(marmot, be at high mountain)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at mountain)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at high mountain)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(marmot, be at all ski resort)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at alpine environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marmot, be at alpine environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(marmot, be at alpine environment)