marriage: ruin relationships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alliance
Weight: 0.66
, ceremony
Weight: 0.65
, relationship
Weight: 0.63
, friendship
Weight: 0.62
Siblings marriage license
Weight: 0.72
, divorce
Weight: 0.68
, wedding
Weight: 0.63
, compromise
Weight: 0.57
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
ruin relationships 1.00
change relationship 0.80
be important part of relationship 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important part of relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(compromise, be important part of relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(compromise, be important part of relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(marriage, ruin relationships)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(marriage, be important part of relationship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(marriage, change relationship)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(marriage, change relationship)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(marriage, be important part of relationship)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(marriage, change relationship)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(marriage, change relationship)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(marriage, be important part of relationship)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(marriage, be important part of relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(marriage, ruin relationships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(marriage, ruin relationships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(marriage, ruin relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(compromise, be important part of relationship)