marsh: be at flat grassland

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.64
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, lake
Weight: 0.59
, water
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ocean water
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.35
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at flat grassland 1.00
be at meadow 0.78
be at wetland 0.76
be at forest 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lake, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lake, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lake, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pond, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pond, be at forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pond, be at meadow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marsh, be at wetland)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(marsh, be at forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at wetland)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(marsh, be at forest)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(marsh, be at wetland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pond, be at meadow)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pond, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, be at forest)