maryland: be considered southern state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered southern state 1.00
is southern state 0.96
is southern 0.92
was considered most important border state 0.84
was most important border state 0.81
has state state 0.79
was key to northern strategy 0.78
was important to north 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(washington, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be considered southern state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(delaware, is southern state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(delaware, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(delaware, be considered southern state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(delaware, is southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(delaware, is southern state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(delaware, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(delaware, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(maryland, be considered southern state)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(maryland, is southern state)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(maryland, is southern)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(maryland, is southern state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is southern state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(maryland, is southern)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(maryland, is southern state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is southern)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(maryland, is southern)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was most important border state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(maryland, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(maryland, was most important border state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(maryland, was important to north)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(maryland, was most important border state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(maryland, was important to north)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was most important border state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(washington, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(delaware, be considered southern state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(delaware, is southern state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(delaware, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(washington, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maryland, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)