maryland: was established in 1634

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was established in 1634 1.00
was formed 0.83
was was founded 0.80
was established as refuge for english by 0.78
was founded 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(delaware, was founded)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(delaware, was founded)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was was founded)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(maryland, was established as refuge for english by)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was formed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maryland, was was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maryland, was established as refuge for english by)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established as refuge for english by)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(maryland, was established as refuge for english by)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was was founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was founded)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delaware, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)