maryland: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was was founded 0.83
was established in 1634 0.83
was formed by lord calvert 0.81
was founded 0.81
was started 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was started)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(delaware, was founded)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(delaware, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york city, was started)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(connecticut, was started)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was started)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was was founded)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was was founded)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was founded)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was started)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, was started)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maryland, was was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maryland, was established in 1634)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was was founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delaware, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)