maryland: was formed by lord calvert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed by lord calvert 1.00
was formed 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed by lord calvert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(maryland, was formed by lord calvert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)