maryland: was found

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was found 1.00
was setteled 0.83
were setteled 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(maryland, was found)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was found)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was found)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was found)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(maryland, was found)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(delaware, was found)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(delaware, was found)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, was found)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was found)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, was found)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was found)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(maryland, was found)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maryland, was setteled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(maryland, was setteled)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(maryland, was setteled)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(maryland, were setteled)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(maryland, were setteled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(maryland, were setteled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(maryland, were setteled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(maryland, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(delaware, was found)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was found)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(connecticut, was found)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(maryland, was found)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(new york, was found)