maryland: was important to north

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to north 1.00
is southern 0.79
was considered most important border state 0.78
was most important border state 0.77
is southern state 0.77
be considered southern state 0.77
was key to northern strategy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be considered southern state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(delaware, is southern state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(delaware, is southern state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(delaware, is southern state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(delaware, be considered southern state)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(delaware, be considered southern state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(maryland, was important to north)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(maryland, is southern)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(maryland, is southern state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(maryland, is southern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(maryland, is southern)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(maryland, is southern state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(maryland, is southern state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was most important border state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(maryland, was most important border state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is southern)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is southern state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(maryland, was most important border state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(maryland, was most important border state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(maryland, was considered most important border state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(maryland, was important to north)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(delaware, is southern state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(delaware, be considered southern state)