maryland: was key to northern strategy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was key to northern strategy 1.00
is southern 0.80
is southern state 0.79
be considered southern state 0.78
was strategically important 0.78
was important to north 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be considered southern state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(delaware, is southern state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(delaware, is southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(delaware, is southern state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(delaware, be considered southern state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(delaware, be considered southern state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(maryland, is southern)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(maryland, is southern state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(maryland, is southern)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(maryland, is southern)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(maryland, is southern state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(maryland, is southern state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(maryland, was strategically important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(maryland, was strategically important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(maryland, was important to north)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(maryland, was important to north)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(maryland, was important to north)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maryland, was strategically important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was strategically important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was important to north)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be considered southern state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is southern)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is southern state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(maryland, was key to northern strategy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(delaware, is southern state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was key to northern strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(delaware, be considered southern state)