maryland: was started

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, baltimore
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, washington
Weight: 0.58
Siblings delaware
Weight: 0.58
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.36
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was started 1.00
was setteled 0.82
was in year 1632 0.76
was formed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was started)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was started)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, was started)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, was started)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(connecticut, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was started)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delaware, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(delaware, was formed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was started)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maryland, was setteled)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(maryland, was setteled)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(maryland, was setteled)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was setteled)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(maryland, was formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(maryland, was in year 1632)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(delaware, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)