mason: is line important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.36
, roofer
Weight: 0.35
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.35
, electrician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is line important 1.00
has shape line 0.84
is dixon line important 0.84
is dixon line 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(painter, has shape line)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(painter, has shape line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(painter, has shape line)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mason, is line important)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mason, is dixon line important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mason, is dixon line)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mason, is dixon line important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mason, is dixon line)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mason, is dixon line important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mason, is dixon line important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mason, is dixon line)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mason, is dixon line)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mason, is line important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mason, is line important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mason, is line important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(painter, has shape line)