massachusetts: has state jobs

Related concepts

Parents	new york Weight: 0.66 , new england Weight: 0.65 , pennsylvania Weight: 0.63 , connecticut Weight: 0.59
Siblings	new hampshire Weight: 0.64 , boston Weight: 0.62 , west virginia Weight: 0.36 , new york city Weight: 0.36 , maryland Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state jobs	1.00
has state state	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(connecticut, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(connecticut, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(maryland, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(massachusetts, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(massachusetts, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(new york, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(massachusetts, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(new york, has state state)